Tibetan Way

Tibetan Way Logo Image
The Jeff Bowe situation

Rebuttal Main PageOpen Letter to BoweOur Statement 18/6/08
Posts to 12/06/08Posts 31/05/08Posts 28/05/08


As supporters and followers of Tibetan Way may know, Mr. Bowe and colleagues have launched a series of attacks against Tibetan Way and our web consultant Chris Farmer. The attacks started on the 24th May and took place in the Rick Ross Forum and in various blogs published by Mr. Bowe. The attacks continued until the 3rd June when one of our advisors had a brief telephone conversation with Mr. Bowe.

The attacks then stopped until, on the 12th June, they were resumed in the most extraordinary fashion. Mr. Bowe then repeated in the Rick Ross Forum facts already set out in Tibetan Way as if he had uncovered some conspiracy. Even more extraordinary is that Chris Farmer directed Mr. Bowe to this information via the Rick Ross Forum some 12 days before the posting in Rick Ross. This means, being charitable, that it has taken Mr. Bowe 12 days to read 24 half pages. Mr. Farmer has already demonstrated that Mr. Bowe is illiterate in Tibetan. It seems that he also struggles with English unless, of course, he deliberately chose to ignore Mr. Farmer's helpful advice and once again indulge in his paranoid conspiracy theories.

Mr. Bowe's attacks are somewhat difficult to understand in that, for example, he continually demands information he has already been given but always does so through third parties. At no time has Mr. Bowe attempted to make direct contact with us. If he had done so we would have willingly answered his questions. Instead he has chosen to attack us. One has to ask why. This is simply not normal behaviour

Chris Farmer explained to Mr. Bowe that nowhere on Tibetan Way do we claim that any of the products use Tibetan ingredients. Indeed, we explain that in our view it would be ecologically unsound to do so. If Mr. Bowe wishes to learn more about the products then we suggest that he reads the relevant pages on our website.

Further, Mr. Bowe has demanded that Tibetan Way add a disclaimer confirming that Christopher Hansard is not involved. This is curious (to put it politely) because Chris Farmer has already made it crystal clear that Christopher Hansard is not involved in any way. Again, Mr. Bowe has chosen to ignore this.

Our fundamental problem with Mr.Bowe is his genuineness. He appears to be a fantasist who specialises in dreaming up conspiracies and attacking people for reasons that can only be described as malevolent. Indeed it is worth noting that one of his Tibetan Way blogs was taken offline by Google/Blogger because it was in violation of Bloggers terms of service. We are confident that the remaining entirely spurious Tibetan Way blog will be similarly dealt with in the near future.

Mr. Bowe also seems to feel that he possesses some superior knowledge which he is unwilling to share with anyone and also believes that he has a personal claim over Tibet and Tibetan culture, a view not shared by any of the Tibetan organisations we have spoken to.

We quote Mr. Bowe from his Padma Gonpo blog, "I happen to believe that Bon, the native religion of Tibet, is worthy of my concern."

The degree of arrogance and self-delusion this demonstrates is quite astonishing. Further, in some of his postings he has insulted acknowledged and respected experts on Bon.

Mr. Bowe has attacked people for not being fluent in either modern or ancient Tibetan. But in one posting Mr. Farmer demonstrated that Mr. Bowe is not fluent. The net result of that posting was that Mr. Bowe not only deleted Mr. Farmers replies from the Bowe blog but also rewrote his own posting in order to remove the comments that had demonstrated his ignorance of Tibetan.

DORJE
An assiduous supporter of Mr. Bowes malevolent and unfounded attacks in the Rick Ross Forum is Dorje who stated on the 3rd June, "I really do not give a damn what Jeff Bowes credentials may be." A very curious comment so perhaps we can help to enlighten Dorje.

We have spoken with a number of Tibetan and Buddhist organisations and with one exception none of them have heard of Bowe. The one exception was a gentleman who recalled Bowe's name and was less than complimentary with regard to Bowe's interference in Tibetan affairs.

Our advisors have been investigating Bowe's "research" and "knowledge" and it transpires that others have commented on these matters in the past few years. Some of the resultant comments were:

"Mr Bowe’s report was speculative"

"Mr Bowe’s assertions were not balanced or objective"

"Mr Bowe was inconsistent regarding the objective evidence and biased"

"We were able to place only limited weight on Mr Bowe’s evidence."

"Mr Bowe’s report does not show clear detachment from the issues."

We will not at this time detail the source of these quotes as we would hope that Bowe will admit that the quotes are accurate and will give his acolytes the relevant information. If he fails to do so then we will provide details of the full report here.

CONCLUSION
Mr. Bowe's knowledge of Bon and Tibetan culture is clearly at best deeply flawed and at worst highly suspect. He also seems incapable of carrying out any sort of unbiased research. Further his attitude to free speech and freedom of debate seems to have more in common with the views and behaviour of the Chinese government than with any Western democratic traditions.

We conclude that all of Mr. Bowe's comments and allegations in his numerous blogs and in the forum must be regarded with a great deal of suspicion. Consequently we now demand that Mr. Bowe and Dorje remove all their comments relating to Tibetan Way from their blogs and from the forum and also issue an apology. If this does not happen within the next seven days then we will be forced to take further action.